Pediatric Pharmacology
The Past
1938 FDA empowered with enforcement of truthful labeling and documented safety of drugs. Regardless, demonstration of efficacy was not required, and risk-to-benefit ratio was seldom mentioned. Law did nothing for kids.
1962 Sparked by thalidomide, the Harris-Kefauver Amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act required proof of efficacy for the first time. This still did nothing for kids.
1997 First regulations mandating evaluation of drugs for pediatric use!
- Pregnant women and children are the "therapeutic orphans", because very few guidelines exist for proper drug dosing for them. Approximately 70% of PDR entries have no dosing information for pediatric patients.
The Present
Presently, proper drug dosing for kids is still not completely known. Many patients get overdosed. Ex: infants require a dose of 0.0025 mL of atropine, but smallest syringe available is 1 cc!
Pharmacokinetics
Kids have problems with bioavailability. One of the reasons for this is that gastric pH is 6-8 at birth (it falls to 1.5-3.0 over several hours). Premature infants have no detectable gastric acid until 32 weeks after birth.
There is no data on drugs requiring active transport or specific transporters.
Cutaneous absorption changes with skin maturation.
Infants have a higher than normal total body water composition until the age of 4-6 months (95% at birth, vs. 60% as adult). This affects VD.
In general infants will need higher doses on a mg/kg basis than older kids/adults.
Infants have a lower amount of proteins in their blood. As such they have an age-dependent changes in free fraction at steady state. This further depends on maturation of the clearance mechanisms (liver, kidneys, etc).
Hepatic drug clearance: drug uptake by liver is low because transport proteins arent there yet, P450 enzymes only at 30-50% of adult activity, conjugation enzymes still being expressed.
Chronological order of Phase II (conjugation enzymes) development: sulfation, acetylation, glucuronidation, amino acid conjugation, methylation. As such, what may be glucuronidated in an adult is sulfated in an infant.
Age related changes in metabolism will affect clearance, and therefore will determine dosing strategies.
Activation vs. detoxification pathways are largely unknown in kids.
Pharmacodynamics
Infants have: changes in receptor number, receptor affinity, receptor-effector coupling (ex: infants have so many b -receptors that b -antagonists dont work very well), and frequency of drug-related adverse events.
There are many unique clinical challenges mostly found in pediatrics: patent ductus arteriosus, hyaline membrane disease (RDS), breast feeding, etc. Pharmacodynamic approaches to these must be developed.
It was only recently that physicians have acted upon the fact that infants feel pain (no anesthesia in circumcision or surgeries!!!).
Adverse effects of drugs in infants due to pharmacodynamic reasons:
- Increased Sensitivity
- Verapamil (cardiorespiratory arrest)
- Morphine (more sensitive to depression of CO2 responsiveness)
- Valproic acid (increased hepatotoxicity)
- Benzodiazepines (paradoxical excitement, hyperactivity)
- Decreased Sensitivity
- INH hepatitis (absent in patients <20 y/o)
- Acetaminophen (almost never get hepatic necrosis)
- Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity (rare in infants)
- Digoxin toxicity (infants tolerate higher doses than adults)
Prenatal drug exposure
- Teratogen
drug that causes developmental problems.
- Teratological manifestations: death of fetus, structurally/biochemically abnormal offspring, developmental delay or small-for-gestational age, decrement of anticipated postnatal function.
- Criteria for recognizing a new teratogenic agent in man
:
Ý in the incidence of a particular defect or syndrome.
(2) coincidence of the above with a known environmental change (extensive use of a new drug, etc).
(3) known exposure to the environmental change early in the pregnancy.
(4) Absence of other factors common to all pregnancies yielding infants with the characteristic defects.
Examples: Retinoic acid embryopathy 1982. defects in CNS, cardiovascular, and ear formation. Due to category X (known to be teratogenic at time of release) drug. Relative risk of malformations ~25.6.
The Future
Fetal Therapy
- Changes in science/technology leading to fetal therapy: new understanding of the placenta, amniocentesis, advanced neonatal care, fetoscopy, chrionic villus sampling, fetal blood sampling, fetal ultrasound.
- Potential areas for fetal drug therapy: intrauterine infection, immune thrombocytoenia, fetal arrhythmias, hyperbilirubinemia, metabolic disorders.
- Problem with fetal therapy: to treat the baby you need to treat the mother because the drug has to go through the placenta. It is metabolically active and can change the drug. Also, it has increased kinetic activity on fetus, and the drug can travel back into mother.
- The dilemma: what is the appropriate response to prenatal diagnostic information? Does the discovery of an abnormal fetus call for termination of pregnancy? Therapeutic intervention? Or is it just an advanced warning?
- Examples: Corticosteroids given to mother with preeclampsia, preterm labor, etc, promotes surfactant development in infant. Fetal arrhythmias detected on routine ultrasound, can have bad results (cardiac failure, etc). Currently poorly treated by giving mother single/multiple anti-arrhythmic agents. Dose and duration limited by maternal side effects. Fetal side effect currently unknown.